I thought that it might
be interesting to post some of the representations I made to the examination of
the South Oxfordshire Local Plan.
In correspondence the
Head of High Growth & New Settlements at Homes England had advised that:
1.It is the Government, not Homes England, that is responsible for
developing policy on net zero in housing, though the agency will work
closely with them to deliver against this; and
2.Local planning policy will set out local expectations for net zero,
affordable housing etc., and again the agency will work closely with the
local authority to deliver against this.
This seems very helpful because HE are
stating that they are happy to work with central Government if net zero housing
is required and with local planning policy, again, were this to reflect local
expectations regarding net zero housing. Homes England should be encouraged to
stick to the words of the Head of Growth.
Given many suggestions that the
examination was a ‘political fix’ I thought that it would be helpful to show
the extent to which it should be an exercise led by planning professionals
including the Inspector as a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute
There is no doubt that professional
planners have been asleep at the wheel and are in a process of playing catch
up. In a press release of 29 June 2020
In launching ‘Plan the world we need’
on 29 June 2020 Victoria Hills CEO RTPI said that, “Chartered Planners abide by
a strict code of ethical conduct of professional standards and work for the
benefit of the public.” And the document ‘Probity and the professional planner
RTPI (Jan 2020) says, “Professional planners are held in high regard because
they deal with the important long term issues that affect the lives of the
general; public. Balancing competing needs and preferences in exercising their
professional judgements is a core part of this role”.
I then tested the patience of the
Inspector by reading from other RTPI documents:
FIVE REASONS FOR CLIMATE
JUSTICE IN SPATIAL PLANNING January 2020
A climate change
position paper
The concept of
‘climate justice’ frames the RTPI’s current programme of work on climate
change. This position paper -the first in a series on the programme -introduces
the concept, discusses relevant academic literature, and explores why climate
justice matters to spatial planning in the UK.
Making the case for spatial planning
… Both public
engagement and equity are long-standing concerns for planners, but the
imperative of climate change makes them even more crucial. … The level of
coordination and collaboration required to weave compelling narratives across
different sectors, communities and landscapes necessitates fair and effective
spatial planning. For organisations which advocate for spatial planning,
whether they are the RTPI, government, charities, academic, or private sector,
this is the ‘story’ which needs telling, and climate justice is a powerful way
of doing it”.
Priorities for
Planning Reform in England April 2020
“Objective 1:
Responding to the climate and environmental emergency . The UK’s progress in
reducing greenhouse gas emissions has been largely driven by decarbonisation in
the power sector. To meet the objectives of the Climate Change Act 2019 the net
zeros law and the international Paris Agreement, there is now an urgent nee to
deliver rapid and sustained reductions in both operational and embodied
emissions across al other sectors of the economy. Planning plays a critical role in the
decarbonisation of buildings and transport as recognized by the IPCC, UN
Habitat and the Committee on Climate Change. While we welcome proposals
for Future Homes Standard to reduce the
carbon emissions from new homes, more action is urgently needed throughout the
planning system,” Including plan-making.
Recommendation one
Invest in
regeneration and retrofit. Levelling up and
decarbonisation requires proactive planning to improve and regenerate
local areas =. More than 80% of the housing stock to 20050 is already built,
with even largescale new builds representing only a fraction of the change
required. Investment in regeneration and retrofit [ ie subdivisions and
custom-splitting], is also needed to reduce embodied and operational emissions,
while improving wellbeing and increase resilience to flooding ond overheating.
Recommendation two
Refocus planning on
21st Century issues
Previous rounds of
reform and restructuring, coupled with an excessive focus on the delivery of
new housing, have limited the ability to plan holistically to wider economic ,
social and environmental issues….. These benefits must be properly accounted
for in the plan-level viability assessments and the examination process.” And
finally the 2020-2030 corporate Strategy states: “Urgency around the climate
change crisis is at the forefront of everyone’s minds. The role of planning is pivotal in achieving global
sustainable development. The SDGs are
due to be delivered by 2030. The challenges that many planners face may be local
but they have global impacts. This sits
within our public interest in our Royal Charter. The decarbonisation of our economies will not be without its
challenges but planning and planners sit at the vanguard of the solution. Planners can build upon their existing
approach to sustainable development and utilize their influencing position to
lead the opportunity to deliver climate action.”
I would be very happy if those prepared
to engage in the plan-making process reminded the professional planners
involved of the stated position of their Institute and the Code of Professional
Conduct. I would also be interested in
the response from the RTPI were complaint to be made against members who have demonstrably
failed to follow the lead of the Institute in addressing the challenge of climate
change and biodiversity loss.
