You wait for one post and along come two. Not only can you comment to the NIC on Congestion, Capacity and Carbon, but comments on the Automated and electric vehicles bill can be submitted to firstname.lastname@example.org by 16 November 2017. Review the Bill at
This Bill gives the impression that autonomous vehicles are very close to be introduced onto our road system and seeks to remove the obstacle of what party would be liable for accidents and damage. It then conflates these difficult problems with the 'range anxiety' faced by users and prospective purchasers of electric vehicles. This is to be dealt with by requiring petrol stations to install charging points.
For those who believe that EVs should be encouraged and that the land use planning system should be used to speed up this process Parliament could be advised that there are more effective ways of bringing this about ie ensuring that new residential and commercial developments only or mostly have space for EVs (and associated charging points), that EVs are privileged in their use of parking at workplaces, recreation and retail and on lanes on motorways and trunk roads. There would be no need for an expensive scrappage scheme if people traded there dirty internal combustion engine powered cars (with pollution from tyres, brakes and road as well as from burning fuel) for freedoms allocated and limited to lighter and cleaner vehicles. The Mayor of London might think that it is okay to be paid a fee to allow drivers to reduce the lives of those in central London and to allow the poisoning of the lungs and brains of children to continue. Figures are being quoted that equate to the Battle of the Somme and the damage to young brains might not be reversible.
So Parliament could be told not to conflate autonomy with electrification and to concentrate on expediting the latter through intelligent use of the planning system (in which case further legislation might not be necessary).