The DfT have launched a
consultation ‘Carbon offsetting in transport: a call for evidence closing on 26
September 2019.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/carbon-offsetting-in-transport-a-call-for-evidence
There are a number of points
that seem to be particularly relevant starting with the need for travel to be
carbon negative long before 2050. Net
zero carbon will only stop the carbon in the atmosphere from going up
(plateauing at between 450 and 500ppm), when it actually has to come down to
300ppm. Travel is rarely a basic need like housing, sustenance (food and water)
and heating so should experience the most severe cuts in emissions. The military will continue to be carbon intensive unless wars turn cyber. The next point is how much easier it would be
to regulate the operators of aircraft, ships, trains and coaches than the
consumer/traveller. In either case all
business travel should be carbon negative.
Offsetting should only be a short term expedient until carbon negative
travel becomes commonplace and must cover the carbon embedded in the related
infrastructure; runways, railways, ports and roads. The DfT is looking for evidence of behaviour
changes and it is likely that a combination of price signals and sticks will be
needed. The price signal will be the
cost of a ticket increased by the cost to the operators of making the mode carbon negative. The
stigma could be a colour of a ticket and/or baggage label (red for excess of
the zero carbon target, amber in excess of the 300ppm target and green for on
target). The DfT is interested in conveying information to the
consumer/traveller and this should be in simple terms, like having carbon
counters (412ppm set above 300ppm) in airports, sea ports, railways and
variable message signalling on M ways.
The parts of carbon per million will soon be a well known metric as will
the alarming gap between imminent catastrophe and safety.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete