This is not and cannot be a comprehensive update but the discovery of a the youtube site https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-e&q=have+we+got+planning+news+for+you
could be of interest. Five senior planning barristers share their recent experiences and cases. I think that it is fair to say that this will only be intelligible to people who have a good background in planning policy and practice - but there are some themes that can be followed if not the finer points of law that keep these people in business. Episode 12 on 8 December had Richard Bacon MP know as the self-build chamion or czar as their guest. He could point to the realisation of the Government that it has fallen very far short of the ambition expressed by Ministers and the potential of relevant legal framework to deliver more than the abysmal 7000 self build homes per year.£100m to make public sector land available and £2 billion towards Help to Build might sound a lot but would be unnecessary if the local councils were actually carrying out their statutory duties starting with the publicity and then dedicating permissions to this sector.
Richard Bacon made the obvious point that the stimulus to the demand side (eg Help to Buy) had caused prices to rise but the proposed stimulus to the supply side would cause supply to increase ie through self and custom building. I wonder whether he voted against the extension to Help to Buy?
Paul Tucker QC ventured that the failure to provide serviced plots in the numbers required would be a material consideration in support of applications for self and custom building on sites not in accordance with the development plan and causing some less than serious harm. Although there was an expectation that self and custom building would be of higher energy efficiency standards than the volume builder product. However, there seems to be no understanding of the embodied carbon in new building and servicing and infrastructure. The reservation of <5% of larger sites was supported but on condition that this was not the back and least salubrious corner of the site.
And on that point readers might be examining the sixth carbon budget and the Energy White Paper to see how carbon emissions from buildings and transport are being addressed. These are not strictly consultations but there is no harm in sending the authors (Committee on Climate Change and BEIS) relevant views. in respect of buildings it is construction carbon that needs urgent attention. The reliance on residential sub-divisions and refits so that space and fabric being heated and insulated is meeting genuine housing needs, needs repeating. Provision of new homes in this way can be done with minimal materials and using existing services and infrastructure and local tradesmen and/or custom builders (see previous blogs on custom-splitting).
On the question of transport a lower speed limit would reduce or remove the comparative advantage of the ICE over the EV and the coach/bus. This would add to the attractiveness and purchasing of EVs that would be adding pressure to the over-stretched charging infrastructure and energy supplied struggling to cope with the growth in heat pump use. However, EVs maximise their range at between 30mph and 50mph so the lower speed limit reduces demand for both re-charging and energy.
BEIS (and the CCC) seems to have missed these powerful messages.